19 April 2012

Goodna flood cheats face justice

IPSWICH flood cheats who claimed emergency money they weren't entitled to have been caught out.

In two separate cases, people had applied for the grants at a flood relief centre and been given hundreds of dollars.

They then went to other centres and reapplied for the grants, claiming they hadn't received any money when filling out the application forms.

Hayley Elena Lei, 27, received four payments of $510 each time in January last year during the crisis.

Lei legitimately applied for the Emergency Assistant Grant (EAG) on January 19 at a Redbank Plains flood shelter and received a $510 payout.

She then went to a Goodna shelter on January 29 and declared she hadn't received any money when applying for another grant.

On February 3, she went to two different shelters at Bundamba and Goodna and made the same fake claims.

All up she received $1530 she wasn't entitled to.

Police prosecutor Constable David Thiel said the offences were extremely serious because more needy people might have missed out.

Const Thiel said the generosity of the grants weren't there to be abused.

Lei pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud, was fined $1000 and ordered to pay $1530 restitution to the Queensland Government.

Lei's defence said she needed the money at the time to pay for rent and groceries and was under a great deal of stress after her property had been flooded.

The court heard Lei worked for an agency that handled debt collections.

In a separate case, Imeleta Brown, 32, claimed an extra $340 at a Riverview shelter on January 28 but had since paid it back. Brown, a mother of three, claimed she misread the paperwork and didn't know she had to declare if she had already received money.

She was fined $500.

Magistrate Virginia Sturgess said both Lei and Brown "weren't alone" by losing everything in the floods.

"There were a number of people who lost everything in the floods - you knew it was a one-off payment," Ms Sturgess said. "You are not alone in this situation."

www.QT.com.au



12 April 2012

Awash with memories as exhibition looks into flooded past



Linda Pitt at the 'Floodlines' exhibition at the State Library.
The iPad shows 3D models of the suburbs inundated and the floodlines.


Say floods to a Brisbane resident and their mind will cast back to January 2011 but the river city has a much longer history of flooding.

That history is explored in the State Library of Queensland's new exhibition, aimed at helping visitors appreciate the full extent of contemporary and historical memories of Queensland's floods.

State librarian Janette Wright said Floodlines was about Queensland's people, their stories and the strength of community during floods, making sense of the past and celebrating the spirit of recovery.

"Floods and other disasters are an important part of life in this state and SLQ has a responsibility to collect material about these disasters creating a legacy for future generations," she said.

"Through this project, we have identified new treasures that have been conserved, digitised and displayed."

SLQ executive manager, learning and participation Linda Pitt said they were excited to offer a Queensland-first experience with the Floodlines Augmented Reflections exhibit.

"We're using augmented reality technology that allows us to create 3D simulations of, in this case, 14 suburbs around the greater Brisbane region," she said.

"The simulator allows people to inundate those particular regions by using a scroll bar that tracks dates and time in January 2011."

She said the simulation can also be accessed on people's smart phones and smart devices and they can pick particular suburbs to see the rise and fall of the Brisbane River.

Floodlines will run until August 19. For information on guided tours and special talks visit slq.qld.gov.au

http://www.couriermail.com.au/
12.4.12

Brisbane City Council flood reports muddy property sales

ADVICE: The best way for potential buyers to find
 out if a property had flooded is to ask the neighbours. 


BRISBANE City Council's Floodwise property reports have been accused of putting a dampener on home sales.

There are claims that the reports, which are designed to provide information about the flood risk of a property after last year's floods, have been responsible for scaring people off buying.

Nick Horgan recently put his Carina property, a prime development site, up for auction, but when no one turned up he rang a couple of developers who said that they had decided not to bid after checking the council's Floodwise report.

They had misinterpreted the report, believing the property had been under 1m of water during the 2011 floods.

The report actually says that while flood levels in January last year were 1.2m above sea level, his property was situated more than 3m above sea level. "The water came nowhere near our place," Mr Horgan said.

He said the reports were misleading. "The concept (of Floodwise) was good, but it was done on the heels of the Brisbane floods when everyone was jittery and on the heels of a downturn in the property market," Mr Horgan said.

He said the problem wasn't just lost sales.

"There would be a lot of people who have sold their property at deflated prices because of the flood or the possibility of a flood," he said.

Mr Horgan said he would prefer to see a topographic report that clearly showed the elevation of a property and where floodwaters came up to on a map of that particular property.

Real estate agent Chris Warren, from Remax Colonial, said the reports were difficult to understand.

"They are very confusing and we cannot explain to potential buyers what the situation exactly is with a property," Mr Warren said.

A Brisbane City Council spokesperson said the council was investigating 15 queries relating to disputes with its Floodwise information after the January 2011 floods.

Real Estate Institute of Queensland chief Anton Kardash said the increasing use and reliance on this type of information in the buying process meant guidelines needed to be developed to ensure the data was accurate and reliable.

Real estate watchdog and lawyer Tim O'Dwyer said the best way to find out if a property had flooded was to ask around.

"The most inexpensive and most reliable way to get flood information about any property is always to ask the neighbours," he said.

10.4.12

07 April 2012

Newman Government at odds with Seqwater over flood inquiry response



THE Newman Government has fallen out with Seqwater bosses over their planned response to the flood inquiry.

The Courier-Mail can reveal that after the inquiry handed down its report last month, the dam operator drew up a press release that refuted some of the inquiry's findings and made no mention of the inquiry's referral of two of the organisation's employees to the Crime and Misconduct Commission.

Senior Seqwater officials last week took the document to Treasurer Tim Nicholls seeking his endorsement so they could make the document public, but he refused.

"The Government did not agree with certain elements of the draft media release, including the version of events put forward by Seqwater given the findings of the commission and testimony at the commission hearings,'' a spokesman said.

"The draft media release provided no mention of the fact that staff from Seqwater were referred to the CMC for investigation, meaning the release was not balanced.

"We don't think it's appropriate for a government authority to refute the findings, which the Government has accepted in full.''

The row comes as flood victims, insurance companies and class-action lawyers chasing compo payouts watch for signals from the new Government as to whether it will admit fault or force an expensive legal fight. 

The Premier is under pressure not to backtrack on a pre-election promise to treat flood victims fairly. 

His predecessor, Anna Bligh, on receiving the inquiry's report, similarly promised Seqwater would be a "model litigant''.

Mr Newman on Thursday said he stood by earlier statements that "all flood victims will be treated fairly and equitably''. He would not be drawn on whether the Government would set up an "ex-gratia'' scheme to compensate flood victims.

It is understood that Seqwater's own insurers backed the proposed media strategy. They could be on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars if legal action proved the company was negligent in 2011. 

The Water Grid Manager, the parent body for Seqwater, said this week: "Given the circumstances, including the ongoing investigation by the CMC, Seqwater does not presently intend to make any public comment on the Commission of Inquiry Final Report.''

www.CourierMail.com.au
7.4.12


COMMENT: This is disgraceful.  What part of "model litigant" does Seqwater not understand?  It seems as if Seqwater - and its insurers - are driven by the almighty dollar and sheer greed as they fight the legitimate claims of flood victims.  Given this latest fiasco, it is time for heads to roll in Seqwater.  Seqwater CEO Peter Borrows could do worse than quietly step down to allow the likely upcoming class action to proceed in a fair and timely manner without the monotonous "we did nothing wrong" which pervaded the Floods Inquiry. - PaulGTully@gmail.com 



06 April 2012

Engineers split over flood inquiry's referral of colleagues to CMC

Wivenhoe Dam
QUEENSLAND engineers have split over the flood inquiry's referral of three flood engineers to the Crime and Misconduct Commission for their conduct during the 2011 disaster.

The peak professional body, Engineers Australia, which represents about 19,000 Queensland engineers, has come out in defence of its three members, but some senior engineers, including one whose home was flooded, said its stance was "ill-advised".

The Courier-Mail can reveal that two weeks after the CMC referral investigators have yet to approach Wivenhoe Dam operator Seqwater, which holds crucial evidence of the engineers' actions.

Steven Goh, chairman of the Queensland division of peak body Engineers Australia, told members in a letter last week that he and EA's executive director Ian McEwan had "been in contact with the members directly involved to express our personal encouragement for them at what must be a very stressful period".

But chartered engineer Wayne Land, an EA member whose Chelmer home was damaged in the floods, said Mr Goh's and Mr McEwan's support for the flood engineers was "ill-advised".

"I think they should stay out of it. I really don't see what they can add," he said.

"It's a legal matter and it's inappropriate for the professional body to be helping them."

Hydrologist Max Winders, who warned in January of unresolved problems with the dams' operating manual, has also written to Mr Goh to complain.

"While I understand your concern about the reputations of the three engineers referred to the CMC, further inquiry would show that several other engineers should share the responsibility of what happened," he wrote.

"There were bureaucrats from other disciplines who should bear most of the responsibility.

"I suggest that EA should stand aside from what is likely to be a complex legal process unless it has new evidence to offer rather than opinions".

Mr Goh said the dam engineers had not been convicted of any charges and the CMC had not found they acted inappropriately in managing the dam.

"Every individual deserves the right to be considered innocent unless proved otherwise," he said.

EA has set up a subcommittee to review the inquiry's final report. "Any comments or feedback from members will be considered," Mr Goh said.

The CMC said it was still "reviewing" the referral from the floods inquiry of dam engineers Terry Malone, John Tibaldi and Robert Ayre over the alleged falsification of records of what they did in January 2011.

A senior Seqwater source said the company was surprised it had not yet received any requests for information from the CMC.

4.4.12

A living memory of the Queensland floods

An interactive exhibition profiling the memory of Queensland's 2011 floods and those dating back to the 19th century launches at the State Library of Queensland.


A vast collection of contemporary digital media and historical articles from the state library collection have been compiled for the State Library of Queensland's (SLQ) latest exhibition Floodlines.

Split across two exhibition spaces in the SLQ in Brisbane the Floodlines: a living memory exhibition explores the resilience of the Queensland community during and after the 2011 floods, while the Floodlines: 19th century Brisbane exhibition delves into the great floods of Brisbane's past, profiling the city as it was as early as 1887.

Historian and curator of 19th century Brisbane, Helen Gregory says the exhibition provides glimpses into the earliest floods that stand out in Brisbane's collective memory, and attempts to investigate why some are remembered more than others.

"In the corporate memory of Brisbane people, we talk about 'the' 1893 flood," that she says came "at a time of economic depression, when unemployment was high, and businesses were suffering.

"There were four floods in 1893, and none of them were much worst then the one in 1890, and that wasn't a lot worse than the one in 1887.

Ms Gregory says she was interested in exploring the collective experience of the community at the time of the 19th century flooding through the popular media of the day.

"I not only looked at the wonderful range of contemporary photographs, but I also looked at the way painters had treated the subject, both at the time and more recently; what writers, novelists and poets had said about it - and there's quite a rich literature about it, so it obviously made a considerable impression.

She says she was most fascinated to look into the lines of communication at the time of the 19th century flooding compared to the role modern telecommunications and social media has played in the recent 2011 floods.

"One of the most important early warnings [of the 1890's] was from a grazier up in the upper Brisbane valley. He had to send two stockmen to two different post offices to try to get a telegram to Brisbane that a huge flood was coming. Only one of them got through to a post office, the Courier Mail actually printed the telegram, but by then the city was already being flooded.

She says as a historian it raises all sorts of interesting questions about "how many of them subscribed to the newspaper."

Ms Gregory says residents in Queensland should not let "the great forgetting" of the more recent flooding events shape how they recover, remember, reflect or rebuild after the next.

Curators of the Floodlines: a living memory exhibition collaborated with number of organisations to create an interactive showcase of the stories before during and after as told by the community members themselves, local storytellers and the media.

Executive Manager of Learning and Participation with the SLQ Linda Pitt says the most exciting feature of the contemporary exhibition is the interactive flood mapping, which allows users to assess the levels of flooding across Brisbane City and surrounding suburbs using a smart phone device held over another element of the exhibit.

The SLQ have worked closely with a company specialising in the technology - called 'augmented reality mapping' - to develop an interactive reflection of Brisbane City, and the surrounding suburbs before, during and after the flood event. Users can scroll through the timeline to see the suburb at different stages of the flood.

"It takes the existing map and terrain data from the 2010/2011 flooding from Brisbane and the 14 surrounding suburbs to simulate the flooding experience.

"People will be able to bring their personal devices (smart phone, or smart tablet device) - download the free 'floodlines' app from the app store and use that to reflect on the flooding in their suburb.

Ms Pitt says although the focus is on the Brisbane River for the current exhibition, there are plans to take the exhibition to regional Queensland, and further develop the mapping data to include towns affected by the widespread flood event.

Curators from the State Library also collaborated with ABC Open for their 'Wall of Stories' feature of the Floodlines: a living memory exhibition, which featured content created by ABC Open producers for the Aftermath project.

Ms Pitt says it was important to draw on the wealth of knowledge and skill in the community for the exhibition to make it authentic.

The exhibition also features former Premier Anna Bligh's handwritten speech notes from the media briefings she held during the disaster.

Floodlines opens at the State Library of Queensland on Saturday April 7th and will remain open until August 19th 2012.

4.4.12

01 April 2012

Wivenhoe Dam bosses holidayed as flood crisis deepened

CLASS ACTION BREWING:
Flood gates opened on Wivenhoe Dam.

NO ONE was available to take charge of the floods crisis at Wivenhoe Dam because the relevant senior bureaucrats were on holiday, flood inquiry documents reveal.

John Bradley, then director-general of the Department of Resource Management and now Anna Bligh's right-hand man, went on holiday on December 25, 2010, leaving his deputy, Debbie Best, in charge.

But Mr Bradley had removed Ms Best as his authorised delegate in respect of dam safety in August, 2010, nominating instead Kate Jones's top adviser Terry Wall - who was also on holiday.

Mr Wall returned from leave and took over on January 10. Mr Bradley cut short his holiday by a week and was on deck the following afternoon.

By that time the dam engineers were muddling through without help from senior bureaucrats.

On January 10 and 11, as the crisis escalated, they sought advice from Seqwater's principal engineer, Barton Maher, and dam safety director Peter Allen, No. 4 on Mr Bradley's list of approved delegates.

The engineers asked Mr Allen late on January 10 to approve a delay in releases as Wivenhoe approached the safety-critical level of 74m set by the manual - so that big dam outflows would not coincide with flows into the Brisbane River from Lockyer Creek. But Mr Allen was reluctant to permit this for more than a few hours.

The $15 million flood inquiry made no findings or recommendations relating to dam safety or the 74m "trigger" level for strategy W4, under which protecting the dam becomes the priority, rather than preventing downstream flooding.

The flood inquiry's 654-page final report, which recommended the dam engineers be investigated by the Crime and Misconduct Commission for making false reports about their actions, focused almost entirely on January 8 and 9, even though most of the testimony last year focused on the height of the crisis on January 10 and 11.

www.CourierMail.com.au
20.3.12

Brisbane flood victims face compenation loss





THOUSANDS of victims of the Brisbane floods could be obliged to give a litigation financier up to 30 per cent of any compensation they receive -- even if that comes from a no-fault compensation scheme instead of a court case.

This risk has emerged from analysis of the funding agreements being used by litigation funder IMF (Australia) for its proposed class action over the flooding of Brisbane.



23 March 2012

2000 sign up for class action over Queensland floods

Goodna under water 12 January 2011
THE massive scale of the proposed class action over the flooding of Brisbane is expected to give the financier behind the case up to 30 per cent of a damages claim that could hit $500 million.

Two thousand Queenslanders have already signed agreements with litigation funder IMF (Australia) that will give the company between 20 per cent and 30 per cent of any damages or financial settlement.

23.3.12

21 March 2012

2000 people to sue state over 2011 flood

VICTIM: Lauraine Ormond of Goodna was one of
 many people asking questions about a possible
 class action against the government for losses
 suffered in the 2011 floods.

OSWALD Van Sanden is one of 400 flood victims at Goodna to have voiced a desire to join a $1 billion class action against Seqwater and the State Government.

Mr Van Sanden attended a meeting on Monday night in Goodna where class action lawyers Maurice Blackburn outlined their plans for legal action over the mismanagement of last year's floods. 

"I was in Brisbane Terrace in Goodna and I got flooded out for a second time but I never got a penny from the insurance," Mr Van Sanden told the QT. 

"I nearly had a breakdown and had to sell my house for half price. I want to see if the lawyers can help us to get some money." 

Lawyers announced at the meeting that over 2000 claimants had already signed up for a class action, with that figure expected to treble in coming months. 

Meeting organiser, Ipswich councillor Paul Tully, described it as a major success. 

Cr Tully called on the State Government to establish a compensation fund to meet all legal claims and to avoid costly litigation in the courts. 

"People deserve to be justly compensated now and not 10 years down the track when the 2011 flood is a one-paragraph entry in the latest history books," Cr Tully said. 

"Residents were fully briefed on the basis of the proposed class action and their legal rights to sue the state government. 

"This could be a long, drawn-out process but the prospects of ultimate success are very promising," Cr Tully said. 

"They have already got over 2000 people signed up through Maurice Blackburn for a class action and they expect that to treble in the next few months. 

"They haven't signed on yet to the class action but they left their names, addresses and details to signify that they want to be sent all the material. 

"There were a lot of good questions raised. One bloke had lost his job and wanted to know if a class action would cover that... and they said it possibly would. 

"There were other questions in relation to renters who had lost possessions in the flood and they were told they could clearly claim. People who were underinsured were told they could still claim and even people who received help from the Premier's fund but incurred other losses could still claim," he said. 

"We had people mainly from the Goodna area but also from Ipswich and the western suburbs of Brisbane. It was a very positive meeting. I was really pleased."

21.3.12

20 March 2012

Flood law suit attracts hundreds more

Brisbane Road Gailes during the January 2011 flood,
looking west towards Goodna.
HUNDREDS of Queensland flood victims have expressed interest in joining a potential billion-dollar lawsuit over the management of last year's floods.

Momentum is building for a class action against the Queensland Government after the state's flood inquiry found the government-owned Wivenhoe Dam operator Seqwater breached the dam manual during floods in January 2011.

Maurice Blackburn outlined litigation plans to 400 residents in Goodna last night.

They are expected to join more than 2000 Brisbane and Brisbane Valley residents who have already committed to taking on the State Government.

The meeting organiser, Ipswich councillor Paul Tully, said the flood destroyed 600 homes in Goodna, including his two-storey home.

Mr Tully said he intended joining the class action to recover losses not covered by his insurance.

"This could be a long, drawn-out process, but the prospects of ultimate success are very promising," he said.

He called on the State Government to establish a compensation fund to meet all legal claims and to avoid a costly legal battle.

"People deserve to be justly compensated now and not 10 years down the track when the 2011 flood is a one-paragraph entry in the latest history books," he said.

Flood mapping and modelling would be conducted to determine which areas would have flooded if Wivenhoe dam was managed according to the dam manual.

20.3.12

Anna Bligh says legal action likely over floods in the way of inquiry findings

The aftermath of the Brisbane River flood on
 13 January 2011 looking east along Smiths Rd
 Goodna,  from near the corner of William St.
PREMIER Anna Bligh concedes legal action is now likely against SEQ Water over its operation of Wivenhoe Dam during the 2011 floods.

After receiving the final report from the commission of inquiry this morning, Ms Bligh said the document represented a "comprehensive, rigorous examination" of all issues relating to the 2011 floods in Brisbane and other areas of the state.

18.3.12

Wivenhoe Dam bosses holidayed as flood crisis deepened

Flood gates opened on Wivenhoe Dam. 

NO ONE was available to take charge of the floods crisis at Wivenhoe Dam because the relevant senior bureaucrats were on holiday, flood inquiry documents reveal.

John Bradley, then director-general of the Department of Resource Management and now Anna Bligh's right-hand man, went on holiday on December 25, 2010, leaving his deputy, Debbie Best, in charge.

But Mr Bradley had removed Ms Best as his authorised delegate in respect of dam safety in August, 2010, nominating instead Kate Jones's top adviser Terry Wall - who was also on holiday.

Mr Wall returned from leave and took over on January 10. Mr Bradley cut short his holiday by a week and was on deck the following afternoon.

By that time the dam engineers were muddling through without help from senior bureaucrats.

On January 10 and 11, as the crisis escalated, they sought advice from Seqwater's principal engineer, Barton Maher, and dam safety director Peter Allen, No. 4 on Mr Bradley's list of approved delegates.

The engineers asked Mr Allen late on January 10 to approve a delay in releases as Wivenhoe approached the safety-critical level of 74m set by the manual - so that big dam outflows would not coincide with flows into the Brisbane River from Lockyer Creek. But Mr Allen was reluctant to permit this for more than a few hours.

The $15 million flood inquiry made no findings or recommendations relating to dam safety or the 74m "trigger" level for strategy W4, under which protecting the dam becomes the priority, rather than preventing downstream flooding.

The flood inquiry's 654-page final report, which recommended the dam engineers be investigated by the Crime and Misconduct Commission for making false reports about their actions, focused almost entirely on January 8 and 9, even though most of the testimony last year focused on the height of the crisis on January 10 and 11.
www.couriermail.com.au
20.3.12

19 March 2012

Successful meeting of Goodna flood victims

Rod Hodgson, Principal Maurice Blackburn Lawyers Queensland,
  addresses the meeting with John Walker IMF (Australia) left
 and Goodna Councillor Paul Tully

A meeting of 400 flood victims was held at the Goodna State School Community Hall tonight.

Flood victims from Goodna, Redbank, Gailes and other parts of Ipswich as well as Brisbane's western suburbs attended the meeting to listen to an update from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers and IMF Australia (litigation funders) on a possible class action against Seqwater.

It is likely further flood modelling on behalf of potential claimants will be completed by the end of 2012 with a decision to be made on a class action at that time.

Class actions can often run for years but there will be pressure on the new state government to resolve any negligence claim quickly and fairly.


Wivenhoe Dam engineers given protection


Ipswich Motorway Goodna looking east towards
Gailes during the Brisbane River flood of 11 Janaury 2011.
Security guards have again been stationed outside the homes of three engineers under investigation for their alleged mismanagement of Wivenhoe Dam at the height of last years' floods.

In its final report, released on Friday, the Floods Commission of Inquiry recommended the Crime and Misconduct Commission investigate charging flood engineers, John Tibaldi, Rob Ayre and Terry Malone, over their operation of Wivenhoe Dam.

Mr Tibaldi and Mr Malone have taken special leave from their positions in charge of Wivenhoe Dam, since giving evidence at the inquiry last month.

The engineers are accused of breaching the dam's manual and then misleading the inquiry over contemporaneous records about its operation.

The CMC has been asked to review the engineer's preparation of documents surrounding the activation of certain water release strategies, including a brief to then-minister Stephen Robertson.

Seqwater today confirmed government security guards were stationed outside the homes of flood engineers in order to protect them from the media and the public.

"In the lead up to, and following, the release of the final report, Seqwater engaged security personnel for their flood engineers via the state government's security services," Seqwater said in a statement to brisbanetimes.com.au.

"These personnel have been required to ask media to respect the engineers' privacy."

Private security guards were hired last month to protect the engineers after media reported that the trio had received death threats.

At the time, Premier Anna Bligh said the security guards were hired only as a precaution, because police had been unable to confirm the death threat reports.

At least one southeast Queensland flood victim has said he does not feel vindictive towards the engineers.

But 70-year-old Goodna resident Dave Carney said he is waiting for them to admit their wrongdoing.

“What I suspected all along and what a lot of other residents suspected – that [dam operators] did the wrong thing in the first place – was right,” he said on Friday.

“They decided they better not let us know that.

“I'm not vindictive. Everybody makes mistakes and they've obviously made mistakes. But the only thing they've done wrong is try to cover it up.”

Tonight flood victims will meet in Goodna to discuss a possible class action against the state government, following the release of the inquiry's final report.

The meeting at Goodna State School will be convened by Ipswich councillor Paul Tully and lawyers from Maurice Blackburn will be on hand to explain flood victims' rights from 7pm.

"This is an opportunity for home and business owners, as well as renters, to recover property and contents losses, decreases in house and land values and pain and suffering as a result of the flood, "Cr Tully said.

"This will be the largest class action ever undertaken in Australia and flood victims are entitled to be fairly compensated for this man-made flood."

www.BrisbaneTimes.com.au
19.3.12

Brisbane River Flood: Call for CMC probe to be expanded


Flood gates open on Wivenhoe Dam. 

SEQWATER lawyers have strongly disputed a key accusation confronting the three Wivenhoe dam engineers as a high-profile flood victim demands the crime watchdog expand its investigation.

Ipswich councillor Paul Tully, who lost his family's Goodna home in the flood, said the three engineers could not be made "scapegoats".

"It would be unthinkable these three engineers on their own (acted) without a nod and a wink from Seqwater," Cr Tully said.

"The CMC needs to widen its investigation."

The flood inquiry, which released its final report on Friday, recommended the Crimes and Misconduct Commission investigate the conduct of flood engineers Robert Ayre, Terry Malone and John Tibaldi.

The men are being investigated in relation to their preparation of a report following the floods as well as oral evidence they gave to the inquiry.

The men were openly accused inside the inquiry about their operation of Wivenhoe.

Seqwater lawyers, in one of their final submissions to the inquiry, strenuously deny the accusations.

Cr Tully said the CMC owed it to the people of Queensland to leave no stone unturned in the search for the truth and to find the real puppeteers in Seqwater.

"It beggars belief that three engineers would (gather) their evidence without a tick of approval from those above them," he said.

"If necessary, they should be offered immunity from prosecution to reveal the whole truth."

Meanwhile, the planned class action against Seqwater and the State Government continues to develop as the largest in Australia's history.

A meeting of flood victims has been convened by Cr Tully at the Goodna State School tonight with lawyers from Maurice Blackburn in attendance to explain how class actions work.

"All flood victims across Ipswich and Brisbane are invited to attend the meeting so they can sign up for a class action," he said.

19.3.12


Goodna flood victims meet tonight


GREATER GOODNA FLOOD GROUP


WHEN: 7.00pm tonight Monday 19 March 2012

WHERE: Goodna State School Community Hall, Stanley St Goodna


Media Release from Ipswich Councillor Paul Tully: Flood victims gather to plan class action

A meeting of flood victims will be held tonight to consider a class action against the state government for losses suffered in the 2011 flood.

The meeting convened by Ipswich councillor Paul Tully will be held at the Goodna State School at 7 o'clock.

Lawyers from Maurice Blackburn will be in attendance to explain flood victims' rights as momentum gathers for a billion dollar class action in the wake of the release of the Floods Commission final report.

Cr Tully urged flood victims from across Ipswich and Brisbane to tonight tonight's meeting.

"This is an opportunity home home and business owners as well as renters to recover property and contents losses, decrease in house and land values and pain and suffering as a result of the flood.

"I urge all residents to attend this important meeting with almost 2000 people already signed up for a class action against Seqwater and the state government.

"This will be the largest class action ever undertaken in Australia and flood victims are entitled to be fairly compensated for this man-made flood," Cr Tully said.

18 March 2012

2011 Flood Sequel: Clarifying flood cover


Goodna at the height of the January 2011 flood, with
the Goodna Railway Station at middle left.

WOULD you be prepared to pay $6000 or more per year in home and contents insurance premiums to ensure your family was covered against all possible flood events?

What about an extra $2000 in home and contents insurance premiums even though your home is perched on top of a large hill?

In addition to Catherine Holmes's Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry, which reported on Friday, the Commonwealth Government and the insurance industry were grappling with how to provide insurance cover for people who need it most.

Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services Bill Shorten said last year: "So much confusion and further heartache has occurred during the long clean-up and recovery period following the devastation (the floods of 2011). Confusion and heartache brought about by the difficulty people face in understanding their insurance contracts, and the devastating realisation for some people that, despite the word 'flood' being in an insurance contract, no cover is offered for a house that has been inundated with water."

Mostly the reason for that lack of coverage is that it is very expensive.

Estimated premiums for flood cover for homes assessed as at extreme risk of flooding are as high as $6777 a year, on top of standard home and contents premiums, according to data from the Insurance Council of Australia. High-risk properties pay an extra $1443 and medium-risk areas face $572 a year.

Katherine Lane, a solicitor with the Insurance Law Service, a national service for consumers said: "Working people can't afford that kind of money. And the last thing the Government and consumers need is for the people at the highest risk of flood to have the least insurance cover against flood."

The insurance companies want taxpayers to foot the bill for those massive premiums for flood insurance.

Rob Whelan, chief executive officer of the ICA said: "Direct, short-term government subsidies are the best mechanism to address flood insurance affordability issues."

The ICA is proposing that homeowners in flood-prone areas would receive thousands of dollars each year to help them pay their home and contents insurance premiums.

The ICA believes the massive cost of the scheme would create an incentive for governments to build better mitigation infrastructure to protect homes against floods. Ms Lane said that idea was unlikely to eventuate.

Another cause of confusion and heartache is how insurers assess flood risks.

"The problem is that some insurers work off flood maps, which can be very inaccurate," Ms Lane said.

Queensland's flood maps seem to be the most inaccurate of any state.

The ICA can only supply flood mapping data for 60 to 70 per cent of Queensland homes, mostly around Brisbane and the Gold Coast.

The Federal Government is addressing these problems. A common definition of flood across all insurers has been decided. One-page facts sheets will give customers an easy-to-read summary of key information in the policy.

18.3.12

Water chiefs stay afloat as they dodge blame over dam mismanagement in flood inquiry

Wivenhoe Dam as surging floodwaters are released.

WATER fat cats in charge during last year's devastating floods retain their lucrative jobs, dodging blame for dam mismanagement as well as an alleged cover-up under their watch.

As the fallout begins from Friday's flood inquiry report, it can also be revealed that three engineers referred to the Crime and Misconduct Commission will have to repay legal fees if they are convicted of any offence.

Without their mismanagement, there could have been "at least some improvement" in the flooding that inundated thousands of homes and businesses in Brisbane and Ipswich, the inquiry found.

While the flood engineers bore the brunt of the blame, the hierarchy of top executives running the state's water infrastructure is almost unchanged.

Dam operator Seqwater's chief executive, Peter Borrows - who received an $80,000 pay rise after the floods to take his annual salary package to $500,000 - remains in charge.

Mr Borrows declined to comment yesterday on whether he accepted any responsibility or should stand down, with Seqwater providing no response to the inquiry's report for a second day.

Law firm Maurice Blackburn said it expected the CMC to conduct a broader examination of Seqwater during investigations into the three flood engineers.

"When you have monumental failures of this type it is uncommon for those failures to simply be the product of one individual or a small group of individuals," partner Rod Hodgson said.

"They often reflect systemic competency or culture problems within organisations."

Final submissions on behalf of flood victims are understood to have questioned how a culture could have developed in Seqwater that could have allowed the dam manual to be disregarded.

There were also concerns over why there hadn't been improvements to the dam manual, heavily criticised by Justice Holmes.

SEQ Water Grid Manager's chief executive, Barry Dennien, and the Department of Environment and Management's dam safety director Peter Allen also retain their roles.

Premier Anna Bligh said the inquiry did not recommend action against executives. Liberal National Party leader Campbell Newman said he would merge water bodies if elected.

The State Government must also decide whether to continue to provide legal assistance to dam engineers Robert Ayre, John Tibaldi and John Malone, who have been referred to the CMC.

Public servants can be assisted during an investigation only if they "diligently and conscientiously endeavoured" to carry out their duties, guidelines state.

Ms Bligh said Seqwater continued to approve legal assistance but "reimbursement would be required if an individual is convicted of a criminal offence".

18.3.12

17 March 2012

SEQ flood victims' meeting Monday night

Cr Paul Tully
Convenor
Greater Goodna Flood Group
INVITATION TO FLOOD VICTIMS

All home and business flood victims from southeast Queensland are invited to a meeting to discuss a class action against Seqwater and the State Government to recover their losses incurred in the floods of 11 and 12 January 2011.

Lawyers from Maurice Blackburn will be in attendance to explain how a "no win, no fee" class action works.

This is an opportunity to recover your family and personal losses.  

This may include your home, business, contents, loss of property values, and/or pain and suffering.

Come along and listen to the the experts.



Where:    Goodna State School Community Hall
                Stanley St Goodna


When:      7.00pm, Monday 19 March 2012


Damages to flow from Wivenhoe Dam breach


Wivenhoe Dam, north-west of Brisbane

THE Queensland government has been exposed to the threat of a billion-dollar compensation claim from flood victims and insurers after a royal commission-style probe found the Wivenhoe Dam was mismanaged and that a cover-up attempted to conceal the truth.

The Floods Commission of Inquiry's finding that the engineers who operated Australia's largest dam failed to adopt the correct strategy to protect Brisbane from inundation for about 36 hours from Saturday, January 8, last year, has given a major boost to the hopes of thousands of victims.

The final report of the controversial floods inquiry highlights misleading evidence by the flood engineers, three of whom have been referred to Queensland's anti-corruption body, the Crime and Misconduct Commission, for further investigation and possible perjury-related charges.

The report opens the door for litigation, foreshadowed by Maurice Blackburn lawyers yesterday as "the largest class action in Australia's history".

The report concluded that further modelling by experts could quantify to what extent the breach of the manual worsened the flooding for Brisbane and Ipswich.

Supreme Court of Appeal judge Catherine Holmes SC found that "the possibility exists of at least some improvement in the flooding outcome for Brisbane and Ipswich" if the dam had not been mismanaged. This is a departure from earlier findings made by the inquiry's expert witness, hydrologist Mark Babister, that the flood engineers had achieved close to the best possible result in mitigating the flood.

Premier Anna Bligh embraced the report yesterday with a vow to implement more than 170 recommendations "lock, stock and barrel". Ms Bligh was forced to change the timing of both the state and local government elections after The Australian in late January revealed evidence of a breach of the manual and a cover-up, prompting the floods inquiry to hold an urgent round of new hearings, test the evidence and significantly rewrite its report. The cover-up almost succeeded.

Ms Bligh, who faces voters at next Saturday's state election, said the devastating finding on the dam's management in the crucial period before the flooding of Brisbane and Ipswich last January exposed Wivenhoe's owner-operator, the government-run SEQWater, to legal action.

However, she said the finding "does not of itself establish liability".

She promised that "any consideration of any claim will be required by the state to be managed by SEQWater in a way that would be required of a model litigant".

"People will be treated fairly, their claims will be fairly and openly assessed and where appropriate, mediated and settled," she said. "I hope those who suffered so terribly through these events will find some comfort in the knowledge that with this report the lessons that can be learnt will be learnt and Queensland will be a better prepared and safer place in future."

SEQWater has its own commercial insurance and Ms Bligh confirmed the organisation has cover "for liability against these sort of events". She said SEQWater and its insurer would "work through any claims made against them".

Lawyers preparing class actions on behalf of the thousands of property owners hit by the floods said the finding made it "crystal clear" there was negligence, and litigation was likely to be launched with fresh modelling by independent international experts.

The four flood engineers could not be contacted. It is understood they have been strongly advised by their lawyers to remain silent in the wake of the referral of three of them - Rob Ayre, John Tibaldi and Terry Malone - to the CMC for consideration of criminal charges. The fourth engineer, John Ruffini, was not referred.

Liberal National Party leader Campbell Newman backed Ms Bligh's pledge to implement all 177 recommendations of the report, putting the flood response above politics in the countdown to next Saturday's election. He pledged to match the $40 million Ms Bligh promised to local councils for flood mitigation and buybacks of vulnerable properties.

Rod Hodgson, a partner at Maurice Blackburn with more than 1500 flood-affected Queenslanders signed up for action, said the report's findings were striking and as a whole showed the mismanagement "must have made a difference" by worsening the flooding.

"Wivenhoe is Queensland's most dangerous piece of infrastructure and it's the responsibility of the state of Queensland to ensure that infrastructure is run properly," he said.

"If the action proceeds, it is likely to be the largest class action Australia has ever seen."

Mr Hodgson said the firm was commissioning new flood modelling with "greater accuracy and more reliability" than any conducted under the inquiry's terms of reference.

Slater & Gordon is also preparing for a potential class action, but commercial and project litigation general manager James Higgins warned any class action could be "complicated" by the referral of the three engineers to the CMC over their fictitious report of the flood event. "This referral has the potential to prevent any civil proceedings progressing until the conclusion of a potential criminal trial."

17.3.12

Queensland flood failures damned


Wivenhoe dam
Wivenhoe Dam

THE Queensland government faces a multi-billion-dollar class action from the victims of the deadly 2011 floods after an inquiry found Brisbane's Wivenhoe Dam manual was breached and recommended three engineers be investigated by the corruption watchdog.

The lives of 35 people were lost and thousands of homes inundated during the massive floods in January last year.

A week before the state goes to the polls, Premier Anna Bligh was yesterday forced to acknowledge the final report by the Floods Commission of Inquiry may lead to long legal disputes for the government and the government-owned dam operator Seqwater.

Commissioner Cate Holmes' damning report recommended the Crime and Misconduct Commission should investigate whether Terry Malone, John Tibaldi and Robert Ayre - engineers who were in charge of the dam in the lead-up to the devastating floods - had misled the inquiry.

The report also recommended a shakeup of council and emergency services preparation for future flood events, including a property buy-back program in areas that are particularly vulnerable to regular flooding, the introduction of severe restrictions on development in areas of very high flood risk, an immediate flood study of the Brisbane River and a mechanism for prospective purchasers of a property to find its flood risk.

Ms Holmes said it was clear the government did not do enough to act when heavy rainfall was predicted.

"The commission has found non-compliance with the manual under which the dam was to be operated," she said.

"What should not be overlooked is that the manual itself is ambiguous, unclear and difficult to use and was not based on the best, most current research and information."

Maurice Blackburn partner Rod Hodgson said the report had confirmed victims' suspicions and strengthened the case for a class action against the state government.

"Too much water was allowed to accumulate in Wivenhoe Dam and the strategy for water releases was botched," Mr Hodgson said.

"This extraordinary report says that, beyond any doubt, that dam was not operated the way it should have been."

Commissioner Holmes found Wivenhoe dam was operated in breach of the manual from 8am on January 8, until the evening of January 9, before Brisbane and Ipswich flooded. She found flooding in Brisbane and Ipswich could have been reduced to some degree if capacity in the dam had been freed up before the December deluge.

www.DailyTelegraph.com.au
17.3.12

Show me flood answers, demands Pisasale

Ipswich Mayor Paul Pisasale
IPSWICH didn't get the answers from the flood inquiry it needs to move on from last year's disaster, irate Mayor Paul Pisasale says.

"We've waited 14 months for something that could have been done less costly and in two months," the mayor said.

"It's cost us in excess of $3 million and for the people of Ipswich, we didn't get the answers we wanted. From my point of view there were two things the people of Ipswich needed for closure. The first is, was Wivenhoe managed properly. All they did was persecute three engineers who didn't answer questions properly."

"They have been made sacrificial lambs."

He said the second issue was people were let down by insurance companies quibbling over the flood definition and taking months to address flood victims' problems.

"Now the insurance companies are saying the flood inquiry exonerated them. You've got to be joking," he said.

He said Ipswich City Council had generally been cleared in the final report issued yesterday.

"There's always room for improvement in how we respond to natural disasters, but overall the council's response has been judged to have been handled well based on the resources the organisation had available at the time.

"Ipswich has been recognised for its best practice mapping of stormwater management and will review all recommendations."

17.3.12

Financial floodgate is opened over 2011 Brisbane River flood

Ipswich CBD looking North-West.
Riverlink top right.

THE Queensland Flood Commission delivered hope to flood victims who lost homes and businesses when it yesterday ruled that engineers failed to follow the Wivenhoe Dam operation manual.

Three of the dam's engineers are now set to face a CMC inquiry over their testimony before the inquiry.

Many Ipswich flood victims are expected to join class action lawsuits after the commission's findings. Lawyers are set to argue that the dam was operated negligently and that thousands of homes should have been saved from the January 2011 flood.

The Ipswich City Council said it had been "generally exonerated" of any wrong-doing by the inquiry.

The findings forced Premier Anna Bligh to admit the Queensland Government is now exposed to massive class action lawsuits, with Goodna councillor Paul Tully - who was himself flooded out - calling for flood victims to sign up to a class action.

Cr Tully said the report lays the foundation for a multi-billion dollar claim against Seqwater and the government.

"I am encouraging all flood victims to sign up for a class action to force the government to the negotiating table or face an expensive legal battle in court," he said.

"Whichever government is in power in a week's time could be facing a multi-billion dollar payout to thousands of residents in Brisbane and Ipswich."

Legal firm Maurice Blackburn and its financial backer IMF Australia are holding a meeting in Goodna on Monday night to speak to flood victims wanting to sign up to the class action.

Maurice Blackburn partner Rod Hodgson said: "The findings confirmed what many already suspected - too much water was allowed to accumulate in Wivenhoe, and the strategy for water releases was botched.

"The dam operators did not release enough water early enough and that meant far too much was released later on. The operators failed to take account of rainfall forecasts at key times."

Around 1500 flood victims have signed up to their class action so far.

Ms Bligh and LNP leader Campbell Newman both said they would implement all of the Commission's 177 recommendations.

Ms Bligh acknowledged there could be long and expensive legal disputes ahead for the state government

Seqwater said it did not intend to comment on the report until they have considered the report in detail.

The Maurice Blackburn meeting will be held at the Goodna State School Community Hall at Stanley St starting at 7pm Monday.


Recommendations

Ipswich City Council has been ordered to carry out its own flood study of the Brisbane River catchment as soon as possible.

Online databases of accurate flood information should be available on council websites, allowing the public to conduct searches on parcels of land.

Upgrading the Brisbane River crossings between Wivenhoe Dam and Colleges Crossing should be investigated.

17.3.12